Understanding why B2B isn’t the consolation prize of advertising careers
- Ed Davis

- Apr 16
- 2 min read
Ad Age’s recent spotlight on the rising demand for B2B marketers was an encouraging read, and has no doubt piqued the interest of many people at mainstream agencies thinking about their next career move.

I’ve spent many years working in B2B marketing across industries and continents. In that time, I’ve seen the discipline evolve into one of the most commercially impactful and creatively demanding areas of modern marketing. And more and more of advertising’s brightest talents are coming to the same conclusion.
The best B2B agencies operate at a level rarely accessed by their B2C counterparts: aligning with sales, influencing buying committees, optimising across long sales cycles and delivering results that directly drive revenue.
And yet, the most frustrating thing about working in B2B is that some people still treat it as a kind of consolation prize. A place you end up, not a place you aim for.
That couldn’t be further from the truth.
What makes B2B interesting is the very thing that puts some creatives off: complexity. You’re often working with niche audiences, technical products, long decision chains and highly informed buyers. You can’t rely on a punchline or a film edit. Your ideas need to build trust, communicate value, and stick around for the long haul.
It’s also a space with fewer of the structural frustrations you find in B2C. You’re not battling for a share of 2.5 seconds on Instagram. You’re often closer to the client’s business strategy, not just their media plan.
For people who like solving problems, asking awkward questions and getting deep into how things work, B2B offers a kind of creative freedom that’s rarely talked about. It’s not about chasing fame—it’s about creating value.
That said, we’re increasingly seeing B2B campaigns making their way into wider culture—such as the Workday campaign and [we could try and get away with a BBN reference here].



Comments